Seminars in Roentgenology
Volume 44, Issue 2 , Pages 84-98 , April 2009

Body Magnetic Resonance Angiography

References 

  1. Wedeen VJ, Meuli RA, Edelman RR, et al. Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. Science. 1985;230:946–948
  2. Edelman RR, Atkinson DJ, Silver MS, et al. FRODO pulse sequences: A new means of eliminating motion, flow, and wraparound artifacts. Radiology. 1988;166:231–236
  3. Saloner MRA. Principles and display. In:  Higgins C,  Hricak H,  Helms C editor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body. Philadelphia, PA: Lippencott-Raven; 1997;p. 1345–1368
  4. Gullberg G, Wherli F, Shimakawa A, et al. MR vascular imaging with a fast gradient refocusing pulse sequence and reformatted images from transaxial sections. Radiology. 1997;165:241–246
  5. Doumolin C, Cline H, Souza S, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spin saturation. Magn Reson Imaging. 1989;11:35–46
  6. Owen R, Baum R, Carpenter J, et al. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: Selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology. 1993;187:627–635
  7. Cortell E, Kaufman J, Geller S, et al. MR angiography of the tibial runoff vessels: Imaging with the head coil compared to conventional arteriography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:147–151
  8. Glickerman D, Obregon G, Schmiedl U, et al. Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: A prospective comparison with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:445–451
  9. Patel P, Kuntz K, Klufas R, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation (Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?). Stroke. 1995;26:1753–1758
  10. Anderson C. MRA of the aortic arch and extracranial carotid arteries. In:  Higgins C,  Hricak H,  Helms C editor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Body. Philadelphia, PA: Lippencott-Raven; 1997;p. 1369–1381
  11. Blatter D, Parker D, Robinson R, et al. Angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Radiology. 1991;179:805–811
  12. Kim D, Edelman R, Kent K, et al. Abdominal aorta and renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology. 1990;174:727–731
  13. Yucel E, Kaufman J, Prince M, et al. Time-of-flight renal MR arteriography: Utility in patients with renal insufficiency. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11:925–930
  14. Loubeyre P, Cahan R, Grozel F, et al. Transplant renal artery stenosis (Evaluation of diagnosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with color duplex sonography and arteriography). Transplantation. 1996;62:446–450
  15. Prince M. Body MR angiography with gadolinium contrast agents. MRI Clin North Am. 1996;4:11–24
  16. Prince M. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 1994;191:155–164
  17. Lin C, Bernstein MA, Gibbs GF, et al. Reduction of RF power for magnetization transfer with optimized application of RF pulses in k-space. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:114–121
  18. Yoshizako T, Sugimura K, Kawamitsu H, et al. Two-dimensional time-of-flight MR venography: Assessment with detection of chronic deep venous thrombosis in combination with magnetization transfer contrast. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:957–964
  19. Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3d acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17:434–451
  20. Liu K, Rutt BK. Sliding interleaved kY (SLINKY) acquisition: A novel 3d MRA technique with suppressed slab boundary artifact. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:903–911
  21. Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, et al. Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med. 1986;3:454–462
  22. Prasad PV, Kim D, Kaiser AM, et al. Noninvasive comprehensive characterization of renal artery stenosis by combination of STAR angiography and EPISTAR perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:776–787
  23. Yamada S, Miyazaki M, Kanazawa H, et al. Visualization of cerebrospinal fluid movement with spin labeling at MR imaging: Preliminary results in normal and pathophysiologic conditions. Radiology. 2008;249:644–652
  24. Miyazaki M, Sugiura S, Tateishi F, et al. Noncontrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:776–783
  25. Bryant D, Payne J, Firmin D, Longmore D. Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:588–593
  26. Gedroyc W. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal arteries. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21:201–214
  27. Bass J, Prince M, Londy F, et al. Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:261–266
  28. Gedroyc W, Negus R, Al-Kutoubi A, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Lancet. 1992;339:789–791
  29. Yucel E. Magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity and renal arteries. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 1992;13:291–302
  30. Ngheim H, Winter R, Mountford M, et al. Evaluation of the portal venous system before liver transplantation: Value of phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:871–878
  31. Lundin B, Cooper T, Meyer R, Potchen E. Measurement of total and unilateral renal blood flow by oblique-angle velocity encoded 2D-CINE magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1992;11:51–59
  32. Schoenberg S, Knopp M, Londy F, et al. Renal artery stenosis: Stenosis grading by combined morphologic and functional MR imaging: Results of a multicenter multireader analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:158–169
  33. Lum DP, Johnson KM, Paul RK, et al. Transstenotic pressure gradients: Measurement in swine—Retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. Radiology. 2007;245:751–760
  34. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: Breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:966–973
  35. Hathout GM, Duh MJ, El-Saden SM. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: Linear regression analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1747–1756
  36. Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevallier JM, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:455–463
  37. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology. 1995;197:785–792
  38. Siegelman ES, Gilfeather M, Holland GA, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renovascular system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1035–1040
  39. Ernst O, Asnar V, Sergent G, et al. Comparing contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography and conventional angiography in the evaluation of mesenteric circulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:433–439
  40. Thornton J, O'Callaghan J, Walshe J, et al. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:930–934
  41. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A prospective study. Lancet. 2002;359:1643–1647
  42. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, et al. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: Comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology. 1997;204:357–362
  43. Neimatallah MA, Ho VB, Dong Q, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vessels. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:758–770
  44. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, et al. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2001;218:481–490
  45. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, et al. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology. 2005;235:687–698
  46. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D: Contrast MR Angiography. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag; 2003;
  47. Chung T, Muthupillai R. Application of SENSE in clinical pediatric body MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;15:187–196
  48. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: Combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol. 2005;40:40–48
  49. Tsuchiya K, Honya K, Fujikawa A, et al. Postoperative assessment of extracranial-intracranial bypass by time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography using parallel imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2243–2247
  50. Xu Y, Haacke EM. Partial Fourier imaging in multi-dimensions: A means to save a full factor of two in time. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:628–635
  51. Hu HH, Madhuranthakam AJ, Kruger DG, et al. Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial Fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:16–22
  52. Zaitsev M, Zilles K, Shah NJ. Shared k-space echo planar imaging with keyhole. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:109–117
  53. Bi X, Park J, Larson AC, et al. Contrast-enhanced 4 D radial coronary artery imaging at 3.0 T within a single breath-hold. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:470–475
  54. Park J, Larson AC, Zhang Q, et al. 4D radial coronary artery imaging within a single breath-hold: Cine angiography with phase-sensitive fat suppression (CAPS). Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:833–840
  55. Zhu H, Buck DG, Zhang Z, et al. High temporal and spatial resolution 4 D MRA using spiral data sampling and sliding window reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:14–18
  56. Wu YJ, Wu Y, Korosec FR, et al. HYPR PR-TRICKS: Highly undersampled hybrid radial/Cartesian acquisition with highly constrained backprojection reconstruction for time resolved MRI, in 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, vol 74. Seattle: ISMRM; 2006;
  57. Mistretta CA, Wieben O, Velikina J, et al. Highly constrained backprojection for time-resolved MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:30–40
  58. Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:551–556
  59. Wilman AH, Yep TC, Al-Kwifi O. Quantitative evaluation of nonrepetitive phase-encoding orders for first-pass, 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:541–547
  60. Riederer SJ, Fain SB, Kruger DG, et al. Real-time imaging and triggering of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiograms using MR fluoroscopy. Magma. 1999;8:196–206
  61. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, et al. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: Application to the renal arteries. Radiology. 1997;205:137–146
  62. Goldfarb JW, Prasad PV, Griswold MA, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance abdominal angiography and perfusion: Implementation and preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:201–207
  63. Watts R, Wang Y, Redd B, et al. Recessed elliptical-centric view-ordering for contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid arteries. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:419–424
  64. Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, et al. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: A potential NMR contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:619–624
  65. Herold T, Paetzel C, Volk M, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: Influence of injection rates and volumes on arterial-venous transit time. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:65–72
  66. Rieger J, Sitter T, Toepfer M, et al. Gadolinium as an alternative contrast agent for diagnostic and interventional angiographic procedures in patients with impaired renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:824–828
  67. Prince MR, Zhang H, Morris M, et al. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis at two large medical centers. Radiology. 2008;248:807–816
  68. Anzai Y, Prince MR, Chenevert TL, et al. MR angiography with an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:209–214
  69. Ruehm SG, Christina H, Violas X, et al. MR angiography with a new rapid-clearance blood pool agent: Initial experience in rabbits. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:844–851
  70. Rapp JH, Wolff SD, Quinn SF, et al. Aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients with known or suspected peripheral vascular disease: Safety and efficacy of gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography—Multicenter comparative phase III study. Radiology. 2005;236:71–78
  71. Robert P, Violas X, Santus R, et al. Optimization of a blood pool contrast agent injection protocol for MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:611–619
  72. Li W, Tutton S, Vu AT, et al. First-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in humans using ferumoxytol, a novel ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-based blood pool agent. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:46–52
  73. Tombach B, Reimer P, Bremer C, et al. First-pass and equilibrium-MRA of the aortoiliac region with a superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool MR contrast agent (SH U 555 C): Results of a human pilot study. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:500–506
  74. Schnorr J, Wagner S, Abramjuk C, et al. Comparison of the iron oxide-based blood-pool contrast medium VSOP-C184 with Gadopentetate dimeglumine for first-pass magnetic resonance angiography of the aorta and renal arteries in pigs. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:546–553
  75. Paetsch I, Huber ME, Bornstedt A, et al. Improved three-dimensional free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography using gadocoletic acid (B-22956) for intravascular contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:288–293
  76. Ersoy H, Jacobs P, Kent CK, Prince MR. Blood pool MR angiography of aortic stent-graft endoleak. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1181–1186
  77. van Bemmel CM, Wink O, Verdonck B, et al. Blood pool contrast-enhanced MRA: Improved arterial visualization in the steady state. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:645–652
  78. Schoenberg SO, Nikolaou K. Whole body MRA with MS325, in International MR Angiography Club. London: Ontario; 2004;
  79. Born M, Willinek WA, Gieseke J, et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the abdominal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22:559–565
  80. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Prince MR, et al. Arterial-phase three-dimensional gadolinium magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries (Strategies for timing and contrast media injection: Original investigation). Invest Radiol. 1998;33:506–514
  81. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Rodenwaldt J, et al. Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:345–348
  82. Boos M, Scheffler K, Haselhorst R, et al. Arterial first pass gadolinium-CM dynamics as a function of several intravenous saline flush and Gd volumes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:568–576
  83. Knopp MV, Giesel FL, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: Intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with Gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:694–702
  84. Krause UJ, Pabst T, Kenn W, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. Angiology. 2004;55:119–125
  85. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology. 2002;224:55–61
  86. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:642–651
  87. Sabati M, Lauzon ML, Frayne R. Space-time relationship in continuously moving table method for large FOV peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Phys Med Biol. 2003;7:17
  88. Lee JJ, Chang Y, Tirman PJ, et al. Optimizing of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography by manipulation of acquisition and scan delay times. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:754–766
  89. Lee JJ, Chang Y, Kang DS. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: Dose the test dose bolus represent the main dose bolus accurately. Korean J Radiol. 2000;1:91–97
  90. Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: When does it occur and why? (Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model). Radiology. 2003;227:809–816
  91. Wikstrom J, Johansson L, Karacagil S, et al. The importance of adjusting for differences in proximal and distal contrast bolus arrival times in contrast-enhanced iliac artery magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:957–963
  92. De Marco JK, Schonfeld S, Keller I, et al. Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography with commercially available triggering mechanisms and elliptic centric phase encoding. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:221–227
  93. Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, et al. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: Optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology. 1997;203:109–114
  94. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, et al. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;203:275–280
  95. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, et al. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:283–291
  96. Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Breen JF, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: Design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology. 2000;215:584–593
  97. Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Ugolotti U, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical ordering and fluoroscopic triggering of the renal arteries. Radiol Med (Torino). 2003;105:42–47
  98. Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Huston King BF, et al. Fluoroscopy: High temporal resolution real-time imaging during high spatial resolution 3d MRA acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:690–698
  99. Ersoy H, Watts R, Sanelli P, et al. Atherosclerotic disease distribution in carotid and vertebrobasilar arteries: Clinical experience in 100 patients undergoing fluorotriggered 3D Gd-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:545–558
  100. Butz B, Dorenbeck U, Borisch I, et al. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:164–170
  101. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Petermann GM, et al. Carotid bifurcation: Evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:525–532
  102. Fink C, Bock M, Kiessling F, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary MR-angiography: 1.0 M gadobutrol vs. 0.5 M Gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:202–208
  103. Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh R, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1615–1619
  104. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: Single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography—Initial results. Radiology. 2001;221:266–272
  105. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:345–351
  106. Masunaga H, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1213–1219
  107. Ohno Y, Kawamitsu H, Higashino T, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:330–336
  108. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology. 2002;225:43–52
  109. Volk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1583–1588
  110. Zhang HL, Khilnani NM, Prince MR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography for symptomatic infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:938–947
  111. Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, et al. Time-resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37:341–345
  112. Goyen M, Laub G, Ladd ME, et al. Dynamic 3D MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries in under four seconds. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:372–377
  113. Carr JC, Laub G, Zheng J, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional pulmonary MR angiography and perfusion imaging with ultrashort repetition time. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1407–1418
  114. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952–962
  115. Turski PA, Korosec FR, Carroll TJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid bifurcation using the time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) technique. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;12:175–181
  116. Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Fukatsu H, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery using 3D time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics: Comparison with real-time fluoroscopic triggered 3D-elliptical centric view ordering. Radiat Med. 2001;19:185–192
  117. Du J, Carroll TJ, Wagner HJ, et al. Time-resolved, undersampled projection reconstruction imaging for high-resolution CE MRA of the distal runoff vessels. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:516–522
  118. Du J, Carroll TJ, Brodsky E, et al. Contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography using time-resolved vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:894–900
  119. Davis CP, Hany TF, Wildermuth S, et al. Postprocessing techniques for gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiographics. 1997;17:1061–1077
  120. Hany TF, Schmidt M, Davis CP, et al. Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:907–912
  121. Persson A, Dahlstrom N, Engellau L, et al. Volume rendering compared with maximum intensity projection for magnetic resonance angiography measurements of the abdominal aorta. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:453–459
  122. Regenfus M, Ropers D, Achenbach S, et al. Diagnostic value of maximum intensity projections versus source images for assessment of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:200–206
  123. Mallouhi A, Schocke M, Judmaier W, et al. 3D MR angiography of renal arteries: Comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology. 2002;223:509–516
  124. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Symptomatic peripheral vascular tree stenosis (Comparison of subtracted and nonsubtracted 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with fat suppression). Acta Radiol. 2000;41:133–138
  125. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: Diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:1066–1072
  126. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. MR digital subtraction angiography with asymmetric echo acquisition and complex subtraction: Improved lumen and stenosis visualization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 1999;17:305–311
  127. Ruehm SG, Wiesner W, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity veins: Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with a dedicated vascular coil-initial experience. Radiology. 2000;215:421–427
  128. Ruehm SG, Zimny K, Debatin JF. Direct contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:102–112
  129. Herborn CU, Goyen M, Quick HH, et al. Whole-body 3D MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1427–1434
  130. Herborn CU, Ajaj W, Goyen M, et al. Peripheral vasculature: Whole-body MR angiography with midfemoral venous compression—Initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:872–878
  131. Hansen T, Wikstrom J, Eriksson MO, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography of patients using a standard clinical scanner. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:147–153
  132. Ruehm SG, Goehde SC, Goyen M. Whole body MR angiography screening. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004;20:587–591
  133. Fenchel M, Requardt M, Tomaschko K, et al. Whole-body MR angiography using a novel 32-receiving-channel MR system with surface coil technology: First clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:596–603
  134. Hansen T, Wikstrom J, Eriksson MO, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography of patients using a standard clinical scanner. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(1):147–153
  135. Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, et al. Multistation whole-body high-spatial-resolution MR angiography using a 32-channel MR system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:529–539
  136. Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Waltering KU, et al. Optimization of contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography with mid-femoral venous compression (VENCO). Rofo. 2004;176:157–162
  137. Prince MR, Zhang HL, Ersoy H, et al: A curved thigh cuff for suppressing venous enhancement on peripheral MRA, in 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Seattle, 2006

PII: S0037-198X(09)00002-9

doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2009.01.001

Seminars in Roentgenology
Volume 44, Issue 2 , Pages 84-98 , April 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution