Seminars in Roentgenology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 290-302 , October 2008

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Female Pelvis

  • Evis Sala, MD, PhD, FRCR

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Evis Sala, MD, PhD, FRCR, University Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom

References 

  1. Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E, et al. MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1577–1587
  2. Shibutani O, Joja I, Shiraiwa M, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of thin-section oblique axial MR images for evaluating cervical invasion. Abdom Imaging. 1999;24:520–526
  3. Takahashi S, Murakami T, Narumi Y, et al. Preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic effect of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 1998;206:539–547
  4. Shiraiwa M, Joja I, Asakawa T, et al. Cervical carcinoma: efficacy of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted images for evaluating parametrial invasion. Abdom Imaging. 1999;24:514–519
  5. Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC, et al. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;181:95–106
  6. Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G, et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology. 2004;231:372–378
  7. Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kigawa J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:384–389
  8. Shen SH, Chiou YY, Wang JH, et al. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:481–488
  9. Sarty GE, Kendall EJ, Loewy J, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging of ovarian masses: a first experience with 12 cases. Magma. 2004;16:182–193
  10. Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kanasaki Y, et al. Detection of peritoneal dissemination in gynecological malignancy: evaluation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:18–23
  11. Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG, et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2813–2821
  12. Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, et al. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 1990;176:715–720
  13. Ascher SM, Jha RC, Reinhold C. Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14:281–304
  14. Tamai K, Togashi K, Ito T, et al. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2005;25:21–40
  15. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features (MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment). Radiographics. 1999;19:1179–1197
  16. Pattani SJ, Kier R, Deal R, et al. MRI of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;13:331–333
  17. Spies JB, Roth AR, Jha RC, et al. Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptom and imaging outcome. Radiology. 2002;222:45–52
  18. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96
  19. Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Jacobs I, et al. MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1307–1311
  20. Shapeero LG, Hricak H. Mixed mullerian sarcoma of the uterus: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:317–319
  21. Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonel HM, et al. Prediction of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: clinical utility of contrast-enhanced MR imaging-a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology. 2000;216:444–449
  22. Hricak H, Rubinstein LV, Gherman GM, et al. MR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative study. Radiology. 1991;179:829–832
  23. Hricak H, Stern JL, Fisher MR, et al. Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;162:297–305
  24. Kim SH, Kim HD, Song YS, et al. Detection of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, CT, and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:766–772
  25. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Sawada T, et al. Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;186:495–501
  26. Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, et al. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach. Radiographics. 2000;20:1539–1549
  27. Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, et al. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23:425–445quiz 534-425
  28. Scheidler J, Heuck AF. Imaging of cancer of the cervix. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:577–590
  29. Jeong YY, Outwater EK, Kang HK. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics. 2000;20:1445–1470
  30. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging–multivariate analysis. Radiology. 2000;214:39–46
  31. Tempany CM, Zou KH, Silverman SG, et al. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities—report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 2000;215:761–767
  32. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2001;21:193–216
  33. Coakley FV. Staging ovarian cancer: role of imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:609–636
  34. Ricke J, Sehouli J, Hach C, et al. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MRI in the depiction of peritoneal spread in primary or recurrent ovarian cancer. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:943–949
  35. Jeong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 2003;23:969–981
  36. Kinkel K, Ariche M, Tardivon AA, et al. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;204:55–63
  37. Low RN, Duggan B, Barone RM, et al. Treated ovarian cancer: MR imaging, laparotomy reassessment, and serum CA-125 values compared with clinical outcome at 1 year. Radiology. 2005;235:918–926

PII: S0037-198X(08)00045-X

doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2008.06.003

Seminars in Roentgenology
Volume 43, Issue 4 , Pages 290-302 , October 2008