Seminars in Roentgenology
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 22-28 , January 2008

Imaging of Appendicitis in Children and Adolescents: Useful or Useless? A Comparison of Imaging Techniques and a Critical Review of the Current Literature

  • Stefan Puig, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Research Program on Evidence Based Medical Diagnostics, Institute of Public Health, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Stefan Puig, MD, MSc, Kahlenberger Str. 32/3/16, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
    • ,
  • Anton Staudenherz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
    • ,
  • Rosemarie Felder-Puig, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health-Technology-Assessment, Vienna, Austria.
    • ,
  • Kurosh Paya, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

References 

  1. Copland J, Lee CA. A dictionary of practical medicine: comprising general pathology, the nature and treatment of diseases with numerous prescriptions for the medicines recommended and an appendix of approved formulae. Boston, MA: Lilly, Wait, Colman, and Holden; 1834;
  2. Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1886;92:321–346
  3. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–925
  4. Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod RS. Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario. Canada Can J Surg. 2003;46(4):263–268
  5. Ohmann C, Franke C, Kraemer M, et al. Status report on epidemiology of acute appendicitis. Chirurg. 2002;73(8):769–776
  6. Bijnen CL, van den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, et al. Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg. 2003;20(3):215–219discussion 20-21
  7. Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, et al. The history is important in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Dig Surg. 2000;17(4):364–368discussion 368-369
  8. Bergeron E, Richer B, Gharib R, et al. Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement. Am J Surg. 1999;177(6):460–462
  9. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, et al. Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg. 1999;23(2):133–140
  10. Pieper R, Kager L. The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy (An epidemiological study of 971 cases). Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148(1):45–49
  11. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ. Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg. 1992;158(1):37–41
  12. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, et al. Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis?. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(10):796–802
  13. Baigrie RJ, Dehn TC, Fowler SM, et al. Analysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992. Br J Surg. 1995;82(7):933
  14. Puig S, Hormann M, Rebhandl W, et al. US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology. 2003;226(1):101–104
  15. Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41(8):745–749
  16. Misdraji J, Graeme-Cook FM. Miscellaneous conditions of the appendix. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2004;21(2):151–163
  17. Lamps LW. Appendicitis and infections of the appendix. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2004;21(2):86–97
  18. Rabah R. Pathology of the appendix in children: an institutional experience and review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37(1):15–20
  19. Nemeth L, Reen DJ, O’Briain DS, et al. Evidence of an inflammatory pathologic condition in “normal” appendices following emergency appendectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125(6):759–764
  20. Bouchard S, Russo P, Radu AP, et al. Expression of neuropeptides in normal and abnormal appendices. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(8):1222–1226
  21. Nemeth L, Rolle U, Reen DJ, et al. Nitrergic hyperinnervation in appendicitis and in appendices histologically classified as normal. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(5):573–578
  22. Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel CA, et al. Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35(4):392–395
  23. Philpott J, Swischuk L, SD J. Appendicitis in the era of ultrasound: are plain radiographs still useful?. Emerg Radiol. 1997;4:68–71
  24. Rosendahl K, Aukland SM, Fosse K. Imaging strategies in children with suspected appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(suppl 4):L138–L145
  25. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158(2):355–360
  26. Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC. US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology. 2005;235(3):1018–1022
  27. Simonovsky V. Normal appendix: is there any significant difference in the maximal mural thickness at US between pediatric and adult populations?. Radiology. 2002;224(2):333–337
  28. Menten R, Lebecque P, Saint-Martin C, et al. Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix: not a valid sonographic criterion for acute appendicitis in patients with cystic fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(6):1901–1903
  29. Lardenoye SW, Puylaert JB, Smit MJ, et al. Appendix in children with cystic fibrosis: US features. Radiology. 2004;232(1):187–189
  30. Hormann M, Scharitzer M, Stadler A, et al. Ultrasound of the appendix in children: is the child too obese?. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(6):1428–1431
  31. Josephson T, Styrud J, Eriksson S. Ultrasonography in acute appendicitis (Body mass index as selection factor for US examination). Acta Radiol. 2000;41(5):486–488
  32. Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Stallion A, et al. Imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in a pediatric population: effectiveness of sonography versus CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(4):977–980
  33. Lowe LH, Penney MW, Stein SM, et al. Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):31–35
  34. Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, et al. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT. Radiology. 2004;231(2):427–433
  35. Brennan GD. Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging. CJEM. 2006;8(6):425–432
  36. Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(4):223–228discussion 42-44
  37. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289–296
  38. Yu SH, Kim CB, Park JW, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis: evaluation by meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol. 2005;6(4):267–277
  39. Weston AR, Jackson TJ, Blamey S. Diagnosis of appendicitis in adults by ultrasonography or computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):368–379
  40. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? (A meta-analysis). Radiology. 2006;241(1):83–94
  41. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE, et al. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology. 2001;220(1):103–107
  42. Antevil JL, Rivera L, Langenberg BJ, et al. Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: prospective validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(6):849–856
  43. Hormann M, Puig S, Prokesch SR, et al. MR imaging of the normal appendix in children. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(9):2313–2316
  44. Willis CE, Slovis TL. The ALARA concept in radiographic dose reduction. Radiol Technol. 2004;76(2):150–152
  45. Slovis TL. Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics. 2003;112(4):971–972
  46. Slovis TL. The ALARA concept in pediatric CT: myth or reality?. Radiology. 2002;223(1):5–6
  47. Frush DP. Strategies of dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(4):293–297
  48. Frush DP. Pediatric CT: practical approach to diminish the radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(10):714–717discussion 751-754
  49. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children’s Hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):303–306

PII: S0037-198X(07)00062-4

doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2007.08.004

Seminars in Roentgenology
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 22-28 , January 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution